零基础雅思写作如何练习
有的考生当初次接触雅思写作时，根本不清楚要怎么合理练习才可以获得写作高分。以下为大家介绍了零基础雅思写作如何练习。
零基础雅思写作如何练习
零基础雅思写作如何练习?模仿写作类似于、但不同于汉译英。模仿写作有一个要求，即文章原本必须要是英语文章，同时还有十分正统的汉语翻译。我们在训练的时候，先不要英语原文，而是看着翻译过来的汉语，先把它翻回英文。后面再与英语原文对照。有比较就有鉴别。
通过这种比较，大家可以认为是同样一个意思，人家用那个词，那样的句型表达，与自己的相比，为何写的好。这比单纯的背诵人家写好的雅思范文，又或是自己不断的苦写，而不懂积累，效果要好很多。这个方法很简单，但对雅思写作水平提升效果不是很大。
雅思写作中重要的构成因素，除了单词和语法以外，“思维”很重要。如果考生们仍然是根据中国人的语言和文化习惯写作，如此的文章西方人有时不可能明白的。
虽然写作没有固定格式，用有效表意当成是核心内容。但不论才开始练习写作时大家的文章布局有多么的刻板，而后的行文又有多自如，当中有一原则是大家从始至终都需要把握好的，其实是自己说的观点，自己必须要把相应的论据提出来证明。
这种原则叫做横竖原则。“横”是大家的观点，“竖”是对观点证明的一个论据。论据要细节化，别想使用一个观点把另一个观点证明，用一个抽象去解释另一个抽象。
有关练习雅思写作的一些素材，可以选择雅思满分范文从模仿写作练起。若考生们处在时间紧任务重的学习状态与考试压力之下，提醒大家必须要同时进行大量阅读范文与模仿写作。
雅思写作范文：科学与艺术同等重要
People still value artists in the age of advanced science and technology. What are the reasons? Are arts as important as science and technology?
在先进的科学技术时代，人们仍然重视艺术家。原因是什么?艺术和科技同等重要吗?
参考范文：
The advanced technology and cutting-edge breakthrough of science usher in an age when the obsession with logic and rationality elbow its way to the spotlight of public. However, art or the artists, the relatively sentimental part of human mind, still deserves a place for its irreplaceable importance.
It is apparent that the intrinsic characteristics of human being’s mind make artists an indispensable role of mankind. The essence of arts is its natural outflow of human emotion and their perception to the world from a subjective and self-oriented perspective, which can arouse a mental echo of the thirst for beauty and the probation of the primitive state of mind. Although we have lived in a world beaming with the hustle and bustle brought by technology, we still need musicians to compose the melodious tunes and painters to depict the magnificence of landscape. Vincent Van Gogh’s Starry Night will not pale compared with the stunning Hubble telescope.
The importance of art cannot be underestimated for the simple reason that its benefits will make a difference to human, albeit the dominance of technology. The pace of modern life has been inevitably accelerated due to the penetration of technological devices such as new media and machines, whose tyranny drains energy and paralyses our sense to the beauty of world. This circumstance is likely to be eased because art can present the aesthetic bliss and therefore reduce the fatigue and tiresome. It seems that the exhaustive soul can be nourished in the company of a light-hearted classic music and a piece of oil painting. We need the soothing comfort of art, as the advancement of our logic is always entwined with the call of our nature.
(281 words)
雅思写作范文：24小时电视节目的利弊
In some countries, TV programs are transmitted throughout the day and night. Some people think that 24-hour TV transmission is a positive development, while others it is negative. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
在一些国家，电视节目在白天和黑夜都播送。有些人认为24小时电视传输是一个积极的发展，而另一些人则持消极态度。讨论两种观点并给出你自己的看法。
思路解析：
1. 不间断的电视新闻直播带来的好处是，人们总是能获取最新的信息，这让人们能了解到社会，甚至是全球的经济，科学，军事，政治，文化的最新变化，这些新鲜信息让观众的思维和知识不断更新，跟上社会的快速发展。
2. 第二个好处是，不管在白天黑夜，24小时的电视能把最新的紧急信息推送给大众，如关于地震，海啸，台风等自然灾害的，这是非常必要的提醒，让人们及时作出反应和准备来避免危险。
3. 坏处在于，它让人们过于沉迷虚拟世界。举例，为了看午夜剧，人们很可能会牺牲掉睡觉的时间，这不仅损害健康，也影响到电视迷们第二天的工作表现。
参考范文：
Nowadays, 24-hour TV news and programs have overwhelming in living or bed rooms in families. In my view, this transmission mode brings both advantages and disadvantages simultaneously, and my reasons would be explored as below.
None-stop broadcasting of TV can provide the latest information to the public with the whole-day availability, which can help viewers overcome the limitation of time and keep pace with this fast-changing society. For example, 24-hour news cycles at night can consistently present up-to-date domestic and international news reports, from economy to diplomacy, from science to war, thus quenching the thirst of acquiring fresh information among groups who have high sensitivity to news, like stockbrokers, businessmen and politicians. In addition, some emergent and important events need 24-hour TV to inform the billions of people on this planet, such as forecasts of bad weathers, natural disasters, as well as the alarming of earthquakes and tsunamis. Consequently, the in-time availability of critical news ensures the safety of all social individuals, by immediately reminding them to make preparation and prevention.
However, with exposure to consistent TV programs, couch potatoes would indulge in a sedentary lifestyle that is detrimental to their health and work, physically and mentally. Firstly, Watching TV at midnight makes the deprivation of sleep among viewers, thus declining their physical health, disordering their day-time schedules, and reducing their productivity in workplace in the next day. Secondly, when people put all attentions and energy in the virtual world on the TV screen, they would lose the interests in the interpersonal communication. That is to say, long-time watching TV serves to isolate the audience from each other, and finally trapping them into negative emotions of depression, loneliness and anxiety.
In conclusion, my opinion is watching TV in moderation is positive, because it can timely offer useful and essential information to the public, which is beneficial for their interests and safety. However, we should be circumspect about the addition in watching TV day and night; otherwise this ill behavior would do harms to the health, work performance and mentality of the audience.
(342 words)
雅思写作范文：警察是否该配枪
Task：Some believe policemen should be armed with guns in order to prevent street crimes. However, others think this measure would raise the level of social violence. What is your opinion?
思路解析：
应该配枪:
1. 在一个枪支泛滥的时代，配枪能保护警察自身。
2. 帮助警察迅速的打击和制止罪犯。
3. 是有效的威慑来预防那些潜在犯罪。
不应该配枪：
1. 枪支可能被滥用。
2. 误伤群众。
3. 被偷被抢怎么办。
4. 刺激罪犯进行新一轮的火力采购，形成军备竞赛。
参考范文：
As opposed to the extensive use of weapons in the US, people in the UK, even the police are not allowed to take guns. Some people argue that it may trigger off insecurity of city dwellers, whereas others assert that it can eliminate the whole violence in the society. Hereby, I would like to discuss both perspectives in the following paragraphs.
Some people believe that the absence of carrying guns is disadvantageous in many aspects in any nations. It has been a trend that the violence is increasing in various parts of the world. More and more criminals these days carry guns and other dangerous weapons, but our police force only have pepper spray and batons for protection (as well as bullet proof vests). This is not enough of a deterrent, not enough in today’s society. If the police have proper equipment, such as, carrying a gun, they would hopefully not lose their lives and the residents will feel safer and better protected.
Others, however, hold the opinion that the police should not be allowed to carry guns. There have been plenty of cases that some robbers or thieves who commit crime but do not deserve death were shot down by police. Furthermore, some unqualified and irresponsible policemen may hurt some innocent citizens even to death when they are pursuing some culprits. Additionally, guns of police may often be lost and will touch off an even worse situation. And thus, it will reduce the overall violence in our society by not allowing guns to the police.
In conclusion, both opponents and proponents of such a practice have their respective reasons and justifications. However, as a person always expecting a peaceful life, I personally agree with the latter view. If the guns and some of other weapons would be totally restricted in the modern globe, the serious phenomenon of violence and other relevant behaviors would vanish. Hence, it is my sincere wish that governments of other countries would follow the example of the UK to avoid the whole violence in the world.
(343 words)
零基础雅思写作如何练习相关文章：
