GRE作文如何准备GRE高分考生告诉你
GRE的高分考生的背后都有着自己的殷勤付出和积累，只有努力才会有回报。两次备考GRE的韩春晓同学有着她独特的经验来分享给大家。
GRE作文如何准备 GRE高分考生告诉你
我也很庆幸遇到了新东方骆彦伟老师，他的课堂节奏快，在课下我整理出了一大本笔记(自己整理笔记为个人习惯，其实老师的讲义就是非常条理清晰的笔记本，结构设计得一目了然，上课要及时补充就能快速学习消化)。按照老师的分类题材，多刷机经，在考场上就不会有陌生的题目。特别说一下小作文，一定要按照老师的方法总结不同类型的逻辑错误及其特征，时间充裕的同学一定确保把题库刷一遍，甚至多遍。大作文我也是刷了一整套题库，不用每篇都写，但是一定要每一篇都有自己的思路和相应素材，然后着重练习新东方点题班上的重点题目。最重要的是提高打字速度，在备考的过程中要多动手，写思路也尽量用电脑打，就可以一举两得。个人认为，要想得高分就一定要有充分的说理和举例。
只要时间久，铁杵磨成针。不论是多难的东西，只要自己下功夫，努力的去学习理解，就可以在最后收获成功。
GRE高分作文的写作结构
In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports(swimming,boating,and fishing)among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however,and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is,therefore,sure to increase.The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to reverside recreational facilities.
这个题目应该算基础类了，首先找结论，然后依次去看指出原因或者前提，再倒上去分析。
这题作者的结论就是：The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to reverside recreational facilities.
得出这个结论是基于这样几个前提：
前提1：居民更喜欢水上运动，证据：Survey
前提2：河水利用率低是由于水质问题，证据：居民的抱怨
前提3：river usage is sure to increase，因为do the river clean up
从新GRE写作满分范文来看，整篇文章结构明朗，每段结构也很清晰。传统的5段式，3个反驳点。
首段：While it may be true that the Mason City government ought to devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this author's argument does not make a cogent case for increased resources based on river use.指出结论以及作者的文章逻辑证明存在问题，没有其它多余的废话。
第二段:Citing surveys of city residents, the author reports city resident's love of water sports先写作者如何认为，然后写自己的反驳，质疑Survey的准确性，加举例，连用了自己的3个假设进行反驳。最后还加上觉得怎样才算好的论证。
第三段：Additionally, the author implies that residents do not use the river for swimming,boating,and fishing,despite their professed interest,because the water is polluted and smelly.也是先写作者观点(包括他文中的隐含意思或前提);接着自己的反驳+进一步展开;最后能加上认为可行的论证建议是最好的了，这样不会一味批判到底，段内结构更完整。
第四段：Building upon the implication that residents do not use the river due to the quality of the river's water and the smell, the author suggests that a river clean up will result in increased river usage.上一段先批他前提2有问题，再表示即使前提2对，前提3也有问题，这样就是逻辑结构更好。
分了If the river's water quality and smell result from problems which can be cleaned, this may be true和If the quality and aroma results from the natural mineral deposits in the water or surrounding rock,this may not be true.结构相当紧密完整;最后一句再次强调作者的论证问题。
结尾：和开头呼应，强调结论可能正确，作者的论证有问题(paraphrase)
所以，发现结论、前提(包括隐含前提)、证据和理出作者的写作思路很重要很重要，其中隐含的意思也要能够读懂。对主结论的把握、(小)结论的辨识也要弄明白。
GRE写作常用词汇整理
同等甚至更多：
commensurably, or perhaps even more;
伴随：
along with; keep pace with; consistent with; in harmony with; cope with; in accordance with; in conjunction with;
serve as catalyst which will foster~;
逻辑：
reasoning; way of thinking; line of reasoning; analysis;
倾向：be less prone to;
在成长路上：
in one’s course of growth;
富人：haves
穷人：have-not
提建议时说作者需要：
a more complete understanding of_;
天生的：
by nature; inherited; inherent; intrinsic; in origin; innate;
供需关系：
supply and demand;
GRE写作高分作文分析
题目：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
分析：
字数：651
语言：平实的语句完全没有网络流行模板的痕迹，也是许多过了6级的考生通过练习可以达到的水平。
I must say that I reject this statement.
Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt.
Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
……
当然，这并不意味，在GRE作文考试中，平实的语言比润色后的语言有更多的优势。从这篇作文中，我们可以得到以下两条重要信息：
1、 通过记忆大量模板使语言“全副武装”、“气势汹汹”并非高分作文的必要条件，这种方式的弊端在课堂上我们已阐述过。
2、 在陈述idea的过程中，体现出critical thinking才是成功的关键。我们在课堂上对critical thinking这一概念做过多次详细的解释，现在请大家一起来体会这一概念在文中的运用。
第一段：
(表明立场)I must say that I reject this statement. (让步)While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, (折回自己立场)that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it.
第二段：
(概述科技的两面性)Technology has helped, and it has hurt. (具体讨论科技的贡献)Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. (具体讨论科技的危害)But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. (表明已考虑到科技的危害，但是依然坚持自己立场)And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
第三段：
(提出反方的立场)Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. (通过具体论据反驳反方的观点)But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
第四段：
(在第三段驳论的基础上进一步立论)What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
第五段：
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. (指出支持观点存在的一点不足)But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. (解决方案)We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hospital, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
GRE作文如何准备 GRE高分考生告诉你相关文章：
