雅思口语考试中考官经常会使用的套话

　　在雅思口语考试中考官使用的指令语言是比较固定的，一般都是按照下面列的这个流程来进行的。大家可以在跟朋友对练或模考时使用，增加练习的仿真度。大家快来操练吧!下面是小编为您收集整理的雅思口语考试中考官经常会使用的套话，供大家参考!

　　雅思口语考试中考官经常会使用的套话

　　Good morning. Come in and take a seat.

　　Can you tell me your full name, please? What shall I call you?

　　Can I see your identification please? Can you tell me where you are from?

　　第一部分

　　Now in this first part, I’d like to ask you some questions about yourself.

　　1. Let’s talk about…

　　2. I’d like to move on now to talk about …

　　3. Let’s move on to the topic of …

　　4. Let’s move on to the topic of …

　　第二部分

　　Now I’m going to give you a topic, and I’d like you to talk about it for one to two minutes. Before you talk, you’ll have one minute to think about what you’re going to say.

　　You can make some notes if you wish. Do you understand?

　　Here’s some paper and a pencil, for making notes, and here’s your topic. ......

　　All right? Remember you have one to two minutes for this, so don’t worry if I stop you.

　　I’ll tell you when the time is up. Can you start speaking now, please? ......

　　第三部分

　　We’ve been talking about …… and I’d like to discuss one or two more general questions related to this.

　　以上者三个部分就是考官经常会使用的一些套话，老师建议考生在考前可以先把考官常使用的套话分析清楚，这样在考试中心中也会有数，就不会慌乱了。

　　老外的雅思9分范文及点评

　　下面这篇在2004年考过两次，内容比较难写，很多考生都构思不出内容，因此，我请我的美国朋友按照雅思作文的套路写了篇范文，大家可以学习一下里面的语言和内容。

　　Unlike most countries， the police in the United Kingdom do not normally carry guns. Some people think it leaves the citizens unprotected， while others believe that this practice reduces the overall violence in society. Discuss both views and use your own experience and evidence.

　　Unlike most countries， the police in the United Kingdom do not normally carry guns. Some people think it leaves citizens unprotected， while others believe that this practi c e reduces the overall violence in society. Police having guns however is an issue secondary to criminals having guns. (45words)

　　结构分析：2+1模式，最后一句为主题句，明确地表达了自己的观点。但是，前两句的问题很严重，即照抄了题目。(这可能是我和老外没有沟通好，在他所写的所有例文中都出现了类似的情况，大家千万不要学!!!)

　　Because criminals usually have access to guns， police officers need them in order to control crime. If police in the U.K. are able to go without guns and not have crime getting completely out of control then they have already set a fine example that other countries should follow. The fact that they are able to do this is an indication of their ability to control the flow of guns to the general populace and this makes citizens safer than anything else. To a civilian， taking guns away from criminals is more important than giving them to police. (98words)

　　For places that are not able to， or are unwilling to control this availability of guns to criminals， police have no choice. Countries with weak or ineffective gun laws， or countries bordering such countries， like Mexico which has strong gun laws， but virtually no way to prevent them from being smuggled over the border from the U.S.， need a police force that is not only armed， but is armed better than the criminals. This ‘domestic arms race’ is the fate of any country that does not realize that civilians have no need of being armed and should have no access to weapons whatsoever.(103words)

　　The root of the problem is embarrassingly corrupt governments and ineffective half-measures taken to control the circulation of guns， which allows criminals to easily come into possession of guns. Nations around the world should hope to someday reach the point where their police force can afford not to carry guns and still be effective. (54words)