雅思写作备考：小作文改写技巧
对于许多有留学打算的考生来说，雅思考试是必须通过的一道关卡。写作是雅思考生普遍失分较多的一个部分，雅思写作由时长20分钟的客观描述性小作文和时长40分钟的主观议论性大作文组成。今天，学习啦就来讲解一下雅思小作文应该怎么写，希望这篇文章可以帮助到大家。
雅思写作备考：小作文改写技巧
一、高级改写的定义
高级改写和低级改写的“词-词”对换不同，它注重的是“词-句”之间的互换。
二、高级改写的核心
高级改写的任务就是将“展示”(show/ present)后的"词"换成"宾语从句。"
e.g. The graph shows the consumption of....
改成 The graph shows how ...
三、高级改写的句型
而这里高级改写用到的宾语从句有两种：
(1)…how … had changed…
(2)…how…were varied…
四、高级改写的步骤
说到这儿，Coco给大家列出做高级改写4个步骤，为方便大家记忆，我把它归结为“十句主持”，请务必记牢：
(1)十(时)：判断时间段还是点;
(2)句：选宾语从句是how...had changed还是how...were varied;
(3)主：how后面的主语要根据题目中“展示”的宾语和图的抬头确定;
(4)持(词)：句子里面的词按照低级改写法要求，能换就换。
现在我们来做一道题目：
(1)十(时)：判断是时间段还是时间点
这题写明是between 1979 and 2004,所以确定是时间段。
(2)句：因为是时间段，所以选 how...had changed
也就是说，上一个图应该配how...had changed...宾语从句。
(3)主：确定how后面的主语(根据题目中“展示”后的宾语和图的抬头确定描写对象)
从题目中，我们可以看到“展示(show/give informationa on)”后面的宾语是 the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat,所以宾语从句应该补充成：how the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat had changed ......
(4)持(词)：尽可能地“词-词”对换
把除了how ... had changed 以外的词能变则变，最后得出完整的P1S1应该为：
The line chart(原本是graph) unfolds(原本是shows) how(原本是词)the consumption of fish and some different categories(原本是kinds) of meat had changed in a Europeanstate(原本是country) from 1979 to 2002(原本是between...and...).
五、高级改写的练习
好啦，大家对给小作文写个华丽丽的开头已经有个初步印象，coco这里发几道习题给大家巩固技巧：
The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 (剑7test4).
The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by for different modes of transport(剑8test4).
The chart below shows information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002(剑7test1).
雅思写作范文：慈善是否应该国际化
Task：Some people believe that charity organizations should give aid to those in greatest need, wherever they live. Other people believe that charity organizations should concentrate on the people in their own country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
有些人认为，慈善组织应该给予那些最需要帮助的人，无论他们住在哪里。其他人认为慈善组织应该集中在他们自己的国家的人民。讨论两种观点并给出你自己的看法。
思路解析：
慈善国际化的理由1：公平性。帮助弱势群体是慈善的第一目标，这和受众人群的背景，宗族没有关系。此外，这能增加国与国直接的互信。举例，如果南韩能资助北韩来对付饥荒的话，则两个国家间将不再有对抗和战争。
慈善国际化的理由2：帮助穷国其实是帮助自己。举例，很多全球性问题是跨国界的，如疾病，污染，恐怖主义。它们源于穷国家的贫穷，却会很快地传播到富国境内。所以，给穷国家捐钱捐物捐药，其实也是保护了富国自身。
参考答案：
Charity organizations always play a pivotal role on helping people who live in sub-human condition or poor countries. It is undeniable that charity organizations help a lot for the less fortunate. However, people have mixed view about whether charity organizations should help own county or other places .It is understandable that people from different background put different interpretation on the same issue.
Firstly, there are main reasons approving of such cross-border charitable support .For one thing, it bases on humanitarian that help those who deserve to be helped. That is to say, regardless of their origin, race, color that means everyone is equal to get the aid. For another, these charitable activities can help to reduce the gap between rich and poor. Actually, for decades, there is always a hostile relationship between South Korea and North Korea. If South Korea can actively provide its neighbor country with crops to eliminate the massive famine, then the tension and misunderstand between them will be replaced by friendship, mutual respect and peacefulness.
What is more, in terms of the strong interdependence between rich countries and poor ones, the assistance to reduce the social problems abroad is actually an ideal measure to protect local areas. For example, many issues originate from poor countries, such as air and water pollution, fatal social epidemics like bird flu, drug trafficking and terrorism, are cross-border and can easily be transmitted into rich countries. Hence, only by donating food, financial aids and medical facilities to these countries for the eradication of poverty-related social problems can rich countries get rid of these potential oversea threats , as well as having a peaceful and clean surrounding environment that keep domestic society stable and safe.
However, towards the same issue other people have opposite view. They claim that sponsorships are limited. First of all, even if in richer countries also have poor people and homelessness. If domestic charity organization fails to take fully into account people in their own counties, it will also lead to the gap between rich and poor. Thus, there are negative effects on our society, such as domestic crime and anti-social emotion.
In conclusion, charity organization is type of non-profit organization and we should appreciate its help that make the world better.
(374 words)
雅思写作范文：政府为大众医疗买单
Task：Some people think the government should pay for health care and education, but others believe it is not the government’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
有些人认为政府应该为医疗和教育买单，但其他人认为这不是政府的责任。讨论两种观点并给出你的意见。
思路解析：
国家医疗的好处1：一个免费的医疗系统有利于社会的稳定。如果只是富人能享受医疗，而穷人不停遭受疾病折磨的话，则社会犯罪和暴力就会增加。
国家医疗的好处2：这有利于降低医疗成本。私人公司做医疗都是为了赚钱。为了获取最高利益，它们会推荐，甚至强迫病患使用最昂贵的治疗方式和药物，这极大地增加了病人的经济负担。
国家医疗的坏处：这不利于大众保健。举例，一旦看病的费用是政府的公共税收承担，而不是私人的话，则太多的人会忽略健康问题，甚至会放弃锻炼。
参考范文：
What is the responsibility of the government on social medical services? Some people believe the government should fully replace the private companies by supporting the health-care system by itself. Personally, I partially agree with this assertion, and my reasons would be explored as below.
Firstly, a universal health service run by the tax revenue of the government can cover all social classes, both the rich and the poor, which represents the human rights of all social individuals, and which is the precondition of social fairness and stability. In contrast, privatization of medical care leads to polarization of medical services. Only the affluent people will be able to derive its benefits, while poor people with non-affordability would be abandoned and struggle in illness. Therefore, multiple social problems like increase in crime rate and rebellions can be expected.
Secondly, the main motive of profit making companies is to derive profits rather than promoting health delivery system. In order to run their expensive models, they are not even hesitant to do unethical practices, for example, tempting patients into accepting expensive medicine, diagnosis and surgical procedures whose effects might be the same as cheaper alternative ones. Thus, it is reasonable to let the government takes the place of these selfish companies with money worship. This policy can put the priority of health care back into interests of the public, and help to reduce the medical costs as well.
However, the worrying aspect of this assertion is that the measure might cause uncertain or even risky results about the overall health of society. Obviously, in order to avoid the costly medical bills from private hospitals or clinics, every individual has a strong willpower of regular exercise for keeping healthy. However, with a state-owned health care system, all medical costs would be paid by public taxes, rather than by private income. This, eventually, will bring a dilemma that many residents would lose the motivation of exercise, and the level of public health and physical condition will decline.
All in all, I believe the benefits of this assertion overweigh relevant demerits, in terms of its great contributions to the social stability and the cutting down of medical fees.
(361 words)
雅思写作范文：投资学校/社区?
Task：The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school, rather than sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample answer：
One of the government duties and responsibilities is to pour its funds to the area of sports and art which can add spice to people’s life. The discussion centers on whether the fund should be allocated to campus sport and art or to the professional counterparts in communities. From a more holistic point, I am in favor of the view that social sports and art events are supposed to receive more government financial aid.
If governments spend more grants in professional sports and events, the value and benefit of sports and arts can be appreciated by more public. A larger number of people ranging from the sports enthusiasts and art fans can be found in communities and the well-funded sports and art events can cater for their needs and bring them more physical and mental enjoyment. Therefore, the core value presented by sports and arts can be better realized and admired by the public. By comparison, sport and art in school are in the subordinate place, which are usually regarded as pastime by most students and teachers.
The sports and art events in community can also boost communication and interaction in neighborhood. People tend to go out their doors to view or participate in the various sports or arts events if the government pours more money into communities. And they can share their understanding when enjoying the work of art or cultivate a sense of belonging when taking part in sports events.
On the other hand, sport and art events in school are also worth government attention. Schools are usually short in funds and the financial assistance from government can make school life more diverse and colorful. However, the fund allocated to schools can generate fewer benefits and other non-government organizations can donor some amount of money to meet the requirement.
To conclude, the government should sponsor the sports and art activities in community even if schools are also in need of financial support.
(324 words)
雅思写作备考：小作文改写技巧相关文章：
