雅思写作推荐好用书籍
一般在备考雅思写作时会用到2大类的资料，一类巩固基础带讲解型的书，教你雅思写作的基本词汇和写作的方法，思路。另一类是雅思写作的范文和句型之类的资料，这些资料重在为我们的作文添光加彩。下面看看具体内容!
雅思写作书籍推荐
1.9分雅思写作--经典范文70篇
《9分雅思写作：经典范文70篇》主要内容包括：议论文70篇、雅思考试真题、新颖的创新手法、独特的写作思路等，全面记录了老师在课堂上总结的有效方法和精辟例文。
2.雅思写作官方题库速背精选
本书是一本精简，易于背诵，话题高频而精华，范文典型且易于背诵，点评权威而直击要害，体例清晰，针对性强为一体的写作书。话题考频高，范文经典，讲解独特。特别适合备考时间短，构建文章能力差，语法错误连篇，复习抓不到要点，又要取得高分的考生。
3.最新版雅思写作官方题库范文大全
本书中收录262篇雅思考官审定的高分范文，囊括亚太、欧美考区全部官方真题，精心分类雅思写作官方题目。书中所列举的题目几乎包括了目前雅思写作官方题库的所有题目。写作题目分类精细，范文典型且附有准确译文。这本书对于将要备考雅思写作的广大考生们而言，是一本难得的适宜背诵的复习参考书。
4.雅思写作速背360
本书中的写作句式附有例句，词汇，附录内有范文，以便于读者理解使用，部分句式的填入部分还提供了万能选填内容以备低水平考生选择。全篇句式组合提供的不仅仅是模板，它实际上是高分句式和读者个人独特思路的结合，让考生能够在掌握模板的同时，达到灵活的运用的目的，以拓展考生的思路，帮助考生写出自己独特的高分作文。
5.雅思真题高频词汇-写作
本套丛书是继《80天攻克雅思》丛书之后，又一套雅思系列图书。紧扣考试，简明实用，针对性极强。其中《雅思真题高频词汇写作》分册收录了高频词汇和8分词汇两部分，其中高频词汇又按词性分为：名词、动词、形容词、副词、短语、连词、介词和代词等8部分，每个单词都配有例句，不同于市面上仅仅简单罗列单词的雅思词汇书，更加详细具体。根据雅思考试常考同义词辨析的特点，在具体讲解每个单词的时候，加入了：<参见某词>的同义词辨析项，帮助读者比较性的记忆。
6.模拟考官点评雅思写作
谁都知道剑桥真题上的考官文章均为满分作文，可是中国考生一般难以理解为何考官要那样写，其所附上的考生文章配有考官评语，本来这些都是最权威、最实战的考试信息，无奈由于思维方式的不同导致中国考生无法理解其精髓所在。笔者利用在考试中心工作六年的便利条件，自己先搞懂西方人的思维方式，然后结合中国的文化背景，整理出适合中国考生的答题思路。比如说，每道题的答题观点是符合考官思维的，而举证是来自于大家自身的学习、工作和生活环境。此书绝大多数内容均为在实践中验证过对错的。换句话来说，大多数观点和内容是已经经过考生在真正的考试中证明错对的，而不是简单地由作者主观认为错对的，所以该书应该是目前市面上所有关于雅思写作大作文最具实战性和指导性的教材和学习研究的材料。
7.考雅老师讲新题-综合写作
本书从切实提高读者英语写作水平、获得高分作文的立场出发，以2003年后出现的雅思考试写作新题为素材，按留学、移民两大类写作的话题组织而成。每一类涵盖若干高频话题，引导读者快速破题，立意，写提纲，组织论证。分析一针见血，范文精悍流畅。每篇范文都由雅思作文老师亲自写作，精心打造，力求地道。堪称本书最大看点!英文的独特表达、经典句型和高分词汇均在范文中清晰标注，并配以必要注解。默诵强记，用于自己作文中，冲刺雅思写作高分!
8.雅思写作7+范文
对于IELTS写作来说，《雅思7+范文》意思着精华与集粹。该书紧密跟踪最新考试规律和动态，汇聚了根据历年写作真题的经典范文，对于广大考生准确把握考题趋势、迅速提高写作技巧，提供了有力的支持。
雅思写作资料推荐
(1)54篇图表作文高分范文
(2)Simon写作电子书-Ideas for IELTS topics(强烈推荐)
(3)雅思写作100句单句练习(必练)
(4)2016年雅思考试大作文范文合集
(5)2017年雅思考试真题9分范文合集 (强烈推荐)
(6)Simon考官9分作文范文合集
(7)雅思A类大作文8大题材
(8)雅思A类小作文7类题型高分范文库(强烈推荐)
(9)雅思写作精选语料库
雅思范文：城乡医疗教育的选择
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. But some others think everyone should be free to choose where they work .Discuss and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, it can be generally observed that the disparity between cities and the country has been aggravated by relentless urbanization. With respect to educational and medical facilities, a yawning gap has emerged between those in cities and the rural ones. This manifest chasm has prompted some to suggest that teachers and doctors fresh out of university work in the country for a few years.Yet many are opposed to this view on the grounds that it infringes upon individual freedom to choose where they work.Personally, I think both these two views have merit and demerit.
Granted,assigning new teachers and doctors to the countryside may create certain benefits.To begin with,this practice can help foster a strong sense of obligation in many teachers and doctors.They can experience first-hand how the rural residents are held back by the out-moded teaching and medical facilities and this, in turn, can inspire a host of professionals to commit themselves to the alleviation of this disturbing situation. Moreover,the inferior living and working conditions in the country can temper many of these young professionals’ soul.They are very likely to be more tenacious and determined and hence more successful than their urban counterparts in later careers.
However,there are even more drawbacks that this practice can engender.In the first place,many young teachers and doctors will feel unmotivated or frustrated if they are sent to rural areas against their own will.They may have a hard time getting accustomed to the shabby housing and primitive facilities and slack off at work.In the second place,if new teachers and doctors are coerced to work in the countryside, a considerable proportion of them may find it daunting when it comes time for them to relocate to cities after a few years in the country.They will feel intense occupational stress when they cannot operate efficiently equipment much more advanced than the devices they are used to back in the country school or hospital. Last but not least, given the inferiority of the rural educational and medical facilities,it is highly probable that the inexperience of new teachers and doctors will lead to unsatisfactory job performance in rural schools and clinics.We really cannot expect fresh recruits to work wonders with outdated tools.
In the final analysis,I concede that sending teachers and doctors fresh out of college to the countryside may produce specific advantages. However,if we enforce this indiscriminately,that will surely generate even more banes. On balance, I am convinced we should optimize our workforce and honor the individual freedom in determining where they work.
雅思范文：是否该鼓励年老员工退休
Companies should encourage old employees (55 years old) to retire, in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, plenty of employees who are more than 55 years old must retire because of company policy; therefore, many people think that the development of a company cannot be separated from the number of young employees. The above point is certainly true; this essay will outline three reasons.
The main reason is that plenty of young employees mean that the company is infused with lots of young blood. With the development of technology, more and more new technological products have been developed. The new generation masters advanced technology and have the energy to exploit. They have learned lots of knowledge in the university; therefore it is definitely useful for the development of companies. Another reason is that old employees cannot adapt themselves to the rapid pace. Old employees find it difficult to learn new things rapidly. With their limited physical strength, they are not capable of heavy manual work. So old employees are not a patch on young employees, it means not only intellect but also physical strength.
Last but not the least reason is that old employees have already worked for more than half of their lifetime, so they should retire to enjoy life. The old employees have already paid out too much in order to look after their families and careers. So they should pursue their hobbies
In conclusion, old employees shouldn’t continue working for themselves. Moreover, advancement of society needs a new generation.
雅思写作：机器翻译与学习外语
Some people think that machine translation is highly developed in today’s society. Therefore it is not necessary for children to learn a foreign language. What’s your opinion?
With the rapid development of modern science, computers have been playing a more important role in our daily lives. It is such a worldwide trend that there is no exception for Chinese.
Many people regard the computer as the magic machine. It can solve many problems quickly and efficiently, and best of all, it can translate all kinds of languages. By using the computer you can just put ail the original versions into it and then you will get the fast translation. So some parents raise doubts about the necessity for their children to learn foreign languages so hard any more.
At first thought, it seems that the computers can really help us to do so. But if you look in- sue the matter deeply, you may find a different answer. First of all, machines can never replace mankind. Computers are created by man and are controlled by human brains. We can never rely too much on machines; otherwise we will become the slave of them one day. On the contrary, we need to enrich our knowledge as much as possible so that we can catch up with the fast pace of the world. It is very necessary to learn more languages so as to upgrade our abilities to follow the progress of the world.
And furthermore, it will do good to children if they learn more languages. Both their brain and their thinking modules can benefit from it. When they grow up, they can easily accept various kinds of cultures and communicate with foreigners, which can favorably enhance the mutual understanding and develop international brotherhood.
So, we can clearly see that, though computers can be good translators, people still need to learn more languages with a view to improving their abilities and facilitating their future communication with people from other cultures.
An argument occasionally these days is that some people often think machine translation can take place of the children's study of a foreign language. As far as I am concerned, I can't totally agree with this opinion.
It first comes to the point that machine translation is not high efficiency. The human language is so complex that nowadays no such machine can translate one language to another sufficiently and totally. The machine can only provide some words or pieces of half-baked sentences. So we human beings, especially children, may not rely on this kind of machine, at least recently.
On the other hand, if the real machine that the whole sentence can be translated completely turn to reality, children should not be taught not study a foreign language. The reason is the language (especially speaking) is made up of not only the grammar and words but also tones and mood. And when children are studying a language, he is not discovering an unknown area, but wild his logic and ideation. Additionally, even if the machine will be out of work one day occasionally in future, he can talk with other foreigners freely.
Frankly, the loss of language sensitivity is much popular these days. Many people's speaking and grammar is terrible. Children often study wrong speaking from annoying TV programs and untrained broadcasters. The invention of translation machine will make it worse. The problem whether to teach the boys and girls foreign languages or not needs to be treated seriously.
In a word, in modern society the translation machine is stealing our sensitivity of the language. People should do something to prevent the loss of language ability, especially in the childhood.
雅思写作书籍推荐相关文章：
